The error in weight has been attributed to excessive tyre wear caused by the teams having to run on intermediates as opposed to the well-rehearsed runs on dry/grooved tyres.
In a statement, the stewards had this to say:
The Stewards accept that the fact of the car being underweight was entirely inadvertent and give credit to BMW Sauber F1 Team for their assistance and cooperation in dealing with this matter.
The reason for the car being underweight was explained as being attributable to excessive and unexpected tyre wear (and therefore weight loss) arising through continued use of wet weather tyres in comparison to the accustomed and anticipated rate of wear for dry tyres.
It is the Stewards’ view that the car did not comply with Article 4.1 of the 2006
FIA Formula One Technical Regulations.The Stewards’ decision is that the car be excluded from the results.
The disqualification of Robert Kubica promotes
Schumacher classified 9th despite not finishing the race because of “lapped traffic”?! Sadly did not see the race as away, so could someone please explain this in simple language please! Thank you. pb
Peter:
I apologise for the cryptic language ;).
Michael Schumacher didn’t finish the race because he had an incident and was forced to retire 2 laps from the end. However, Michael had lapped the Midlands at least twice during the race, so when he retired on lap 68, Albers and Monteiro couldn’t unlap themselves two full laps before the race finished. Therefore, they couldn’t actually overtake Schumacher. Thus, the Midlands were officially classified as finishing behind Michael’s Ferrari, who ‘finished’ in 9th, and then promoted to 8th after Kubica was disqualified.
I appreciate that still doesn’t explain it very well. Does anyone else have a better way of saying it? Your comments are welcome.